Coast & Fell
Gearwaterproof-trainers

Waterproof Trainers vs Waterproof Socks: Which Should You Buy? (And When You Want Both)

£20 of waterproof socks can make the trainers you already love wet-weather footwear, and sometimes that beats £145 of GORE-TEX. The honest decision guide: when socks win, when waterproof trainers win, and the winter case for wearing both.

By Shane Feltham·
Waterproof Trainers vs Waterproof Socks: Which Should You Buy? (And When You Want Both)

Quick answer

Buy waterproof socks (from about £20) if you want to keep wearing shoes you already own and love: they turn mesh trainers into wet-weather footwear, protect higher up the ankle than any low shoe membrane, and move between every pair you own. Buy waterproof trainers (from about £60) if you want dry feet with zero thought every day: nothing to remember, normal socks, and better breathability than a membrane sock. The depth maths favours socks (a trainer membrane stops at the collar; a mid-length sock protects far higher), the convenience maths favours trainers, and for winter hiking the honest answer is both, with the sock cuff covering the shoe's one weakness.

Our pick: SEALSKINZ Wretham (Ankle, Bamboo)

Here is a question nobody selling you shoes will ask: do you actually need waterproof trainers, or do you need waterproof feet? They are not the same purchase. One is £60 to £145 of footwear with a membrane bonded inside it; the other is £20 to £40 of sock that makes any footwear waterproof, including the disgracefully comfortable mesh trainers you already own. We review waterproof trainers in depth and we have just done the same for waterproof socks, which puts us in the rare position of answering the versus question honestly: each wins different lives, and winter hikers have a strong case for both.

The decision in one table

Waterproof trainersWaterproof socks
Typical cost£60 to £145£20 to £40 a pair
Protects toThe shoe collar (below the ankle)Mid-calf or higher, depending on length
Works withThat one pair of shoesEvery shoe you own
FeelNormal socks, normal shoe feelSlightly thicker, more structured sock
BreathabilityBetter (membrane has a whole shoe to breathe through)More limited; feet run warmer
When soaked over the topDries in a day or moreSock swaps for a dry pair in seconds
Daily convenienceZero thought, always onMust remember to put them on
Failure pointWater over the low collarWater over the cuff (higher up)

The case for waterproof socks

They waterproof the shoes you actually like. This is the killer argument. The best-fitting, best-cushioned, most breathable shoe in your rotation is probably not waterproof, and a pair of Sealskinz Wretham or DexShell Ultralite makes it so for £20-odd. The commuter in mesh trainers, the runner whose shoes drain beautifully, the dog walker in battered everyday shoes: all solved without changing footwear.

They protect higher. A trainer's membrane ends at the collar, below your ankle bone, and our Salomon Aero Blaze review says what every honest low-shoe review says: step deeper than the collar and water comes in over the top. A mid-length waterproof sock raises that waterline by several inches; a knee-length one like the DexShell Knee High raises it to welly territory. For puddled towpaths, flooded gateways and long wet grass, the sock's protection ceiling is simply higher.

One purchase covers everything. Socks move between trainers, trail shoes and boots. A membrane shoe waterproofs exactly one pair.

The honest costs: they are a thing you must remember to wear; they feel slightly thicker than normal socks (choose thin models for snug shoes); feet run warmer in them; and in sustained rain you want trousers overlapping the cuff, because the cuff is their one way in. The full honest picture, sweat, washing, lifespan, is in the waterproof socks guide.

The case for waterproof trainers

Zero cognitive load. The shoe is always waterproof. No checking the forecast, no special socks in the drawer, no decisions at 6:45am. For the daily default shoe of someone who lives somewhere wet, which is everyone in Britain, that effortlessness is worth real money.

Normal socks, better breathability. A GORE-TEX shoe breathes through its whole upper while you wear whatever socks you like, including the thinnest summer pairs. Waterproof socks concentrate the membrane around your foot, which is why they run warmer: fine in November, less fine in May.

Underfoot wet is their home ground. Persistent surface wet, soaked grass, mud, drizzle-all-day paths, is exactly what a membrane shoe handles for hours with zero thought. Our best waterproof trainers guide ranks the current field, with the adidas Terrex Anylander proving the entry price is only about £60.

The honest costs: a soaked-over-the-top waterproof shoe is the slowest-drying object in your hallway, the membrane adds a little warmth and weight year-round whether you need it or not, and the protection stops at the collar forever; no sock swap can raise it.

The case for both: the winter system

For winter hiking, the belt-and-braces answer is genuinely the best one. The shoe's membrane handles the ground-level wet; the sock's membrane covers the shoe's one weakness, the over-the-collar moment in the flooded gateway or the misjudged stream, and raises the system's waterline to mid-calf. And if the worst happens anyway, you swap the socks and walk on dry; the wet shoe no longer matters to your skin. Cold-weather models like the merino-lined Sealskinz Starston add insulation a trainer never will, which is how a pair of low GORE-TEX trainers stays viable on winter fells long after conventional wisdom says boots.

Pairing note from both sock brands' own sizing guidance: waterproof socks are more structured than normal socks, so in a snug trainer choose the thin models (the Wretham or DexShell's Ultra Thin) or consider the shoe a half-size up if you are between sizes anyway.

Four real scenarios, answered

The commuter whose mesh trainers soak through: waterproof socks, no contest. £20 fixes the exact shoes you like walking in. (This is the single most-asked version of this question, and the answer never changes.)

The dog walker, twice a day, every weather: either works; the honest tiebreak is temperament. If you want never to think about it, waterproof trainers as your default outdoor shoe. If your walking shoes rotate, socks like the quarter-crew Ultralite in whatever is by the door, and the women's guide covers the wellies-alternative case in full.

The winter walker and hiker: both, as above. Trainer or boot handles the ground, sock raises the waterline and adds warmth.

The runner in winter: socks, in your normal fast-draining shoes. A waterproof running shoe fights how running shoes are designed to work; a thin waterproof sock (DexShell's running models run Coolmax linings with a compression fit) keeps rain and splash off while the shoe does its job. Honest caveat from the sweat section of the pillar: at hard effort the inside will be damp from you; in winter that trade is still worth making, because damp and warm beats soaked and freezing.

FAQ

Are waterproof socks better than waterproof shoes?
They solve the same problem differently: waterproof socks (from about £20) work with every shoe you own and protect higher up the leg, while waterproof trainers (from about £60) give zero-effort dry feet with normal socks and better breathability. Socks win for commuters and runners who love their existing non-waterproof shoes; trainers win as an everyday default you never think about; winter hikers genuinely benefit from both at once.
Do waterproof socks work with normal trainers?
Yes, that is their best trick: a waterproof sock contains its own membrane, so mesh trainers, running shoes or any non-waterproof footwear become wet-weather capable the moment you put the socks on. Choose thin models for close-fitting shoes, such as the seamless Sealskinz Wretham or DexShell's Ultra Thin, because waterproof socks are slightly thicker than normal socks and a too-tight fit causes pressure and defeats the comfort.
Can you wear waterproof socks with waterproof shoes?
Yes, and for winter hiking it is the strongest setup available short of wellies: the shoe's membrane handles ground-level water while the sock raises protection to mid-calf and covers the over-the-collar flooding that defeats every low waterproof shoe. If water does get over the top, dry socks swap in seconds while the shoe's wetness stops mattering. The trade is warmth, so it is a cold-season system rather than a summer one.
Share X / Twitter Facebook

Get the newsletter

Free printable PDF guides, new trail routes with GPX downloads, honest gear reviews and the occasional deal actually worth knowing about. Monthly at most, no spam, unsubscribe any time.