Trail Running Shoes vs Hiking Shoes: Which for UK?

Can you hike in trail running shoes? Yes. For day hikes with a light pack, trail runners are a legitimate choice, not a compromise. Plenty of experienced long-distance walkers in the UK now prefer them to a traditional hiking shoe, and after a couple of hundred kilometres on the Jurassic Coast in a pair I understand why.

That is the answer the internet tends to bury under caveats, so I will put it up front. Trail runners are lighter, they breathe better, and on most of the mixed trail I walk they grip at least as well as a hiking shoe. The trade-offs are real, but they are trade-offs, not deal-breakers, and this guide walks through exactly what you give up and what you gain so you can pick for your own feet and your own terrain.

If you are weighing shoes against boots more broadly, that is a separate question with its own guide: walking shoes vs walking boots. This page is specifically about the trail-runner-versus-hiking-shoe end of the low-cut spectrum.

The short answer

A trail running shoe and a hiking shoe are closer relatives than the marketing suggests. Both are low-cut, both are built for off-road ground, and the good ones from either camp will get you round a UK day walk without complaint.

The differences come down to five things: weight, protection, grip compound, how fast they drain and dry, and how long they last. Get those clear in your head and the choice more or less makes itself.

Here is the rough shape of it before we get into detail:

Trail running shoes are lighter (around 250 to 350g per shoe), breathe and drain faster, and use a softer, grippier rubber that wears quicker. Expect roughly 500 to 800km from a pair.
Hiking shoes are heavier and more structured, often with a rock plate and a stiffer sole, use a harder-wearing outsole, and typically last 800 to 1,000km or more.

Neither is "better". They are tuned for different priorities, and which set of priorities matches your walking is the whole game.

Weight: the difference you feel first

This is the one you notice before you have left the car park.

A trail running shoe usually sits somewhere around 250 to 350g per shoe. A hiking shoe is heavier, often noticeably so once you add a stiffer sole unit and more structured upper, and a mid boot heavier still. It does not sound like much on paper, but weight on your feet costs you far more than weight on your back, because you lift it with every single stride. Over a 25km day that adds up to real fatigue in the legs.

The old walker's rule of thumb, that a pound on the feet equals five on the back, is not literal physics but it is a fair reflection of how it feels. Lighter feet at the end of a long day is the single biggest reason converts do not go back.

Protection and structure

This is where the hiking shoe earns its extra grams.

Trail runners tend to use thinner mesh uppers. That is deliberate, it is what makes them light and breathable, but it means less protection against sharp rock, less abrasion resistance, and a shoe that flexes more underfoot. Kick a flint the wrong way and you feel it more than you would in something burlier.

Hiking shoes are built up: thicker, more supportive uppers, often a firmer heel counter, and frequently a rock plate, a stiff layer in the sole that stops sharp stones bruising the ball of your foot. The sole is stiffer overall, which some people prefer under a load or on rough ground because the shoe does more of the work and your foot does less.

If you carry a heavier pack, that structure matters more. A light day pack and trail runners get on fine. Load up for a multi-day trip with a full pack and the extra support under and around the foot starts to earn its keep.

Grip: soft and sticky vs hard and durable

Grip is the part people get wrong, because they assume the chunkier-looking hiking shoe must grip better. It often does not.

Trail running shoes tend to use a softer, stickier rubber. Soft rubber deforms into the surface and holds, which is why it grips so well on wet rock, chalk and loose trail. The price you pay is wear: soft rubber wears faster, so the lugs round off sooner than they would on a harder compound.

Hiking shoe outsoles usually run a harder-wearing rubber. It lasts longer and copes better with sustained abrasive ground, but it can feel less tenacious on greasy rock than a good sticky running compound.

One thing worth knowing if you are coming to trail runners from running: test the grip at walking pace, not running pace. A soft, aggressive lug pattern that bites beautifully when you are moving fast can feel a little vague and skittish when you are picking your way slowly down a wet, off-camber descent, because you are not driving into the ground the same way. It is not a fault, it is just a different feel, and worth a gentle first outing to get used to.

Drying: the wet-feet approach

This is where a lot of the modern preference for trail runners comes from, and it flips conventional wisdom on its head.

A non-waterproof mesh trail runner does not try to keep water out. Water goes straight through the mesh, and just as importantly it drains straight back out and the shoe dries fast on your feet as you walk. That sounds mad until you have done a wet UK walk in them, at which point it clicks: you stop fighting to keep your feet dry and simply accept wet feet, knowing they will not stay soaked and cold for long.

A waterproof-lined shoe or boot keeps splashes and wet grass out well enough, right up until water comes over the top or soaks through, and then it holds the water in. A lined shoe that has flooded takes an age to dry. A mesh runner that has flooded is nearly dry again within a mile or two on a warm day.

For a lot of long-distance walkers, the drain-and-dry approach with good socks has become the preferred way to deal with British weather, especially in summer, when the ground is wet from dew or a downpour but the air is warm enough to dry the shoe as you go. It is not for everyone, and it is miserable in the cold, but it is a real advantage worth understanding rather than dismissing.

Lifespan: what you get for your money

You get fewer miles from a trail runner, and this is the honest cost of all that softness and light weight.

A pair of trail running shoes typically gives you somewhere around 500 to 800km before the midsole cushioning packs out and the grip lugs are worn down. Hiking shoes, with harder rubber and more robust build, will often see 800 to 1,000km or more.

So per pound, a hiking shoe usually costs less to run. Set that against the weight saving and the day-to-day comfort of the lighter shoe and it becomes a genuine choice rather than a clear win either way. If you walk big miles and care about cost per kilometre, the hiking shoe has a point. If you value fresh legs at the end of the day and do not mind replacing shoes more often, the trail runner earns its keep.

When trail runners win

Reach for trail running shoes when the priority is moving fast and light. Specifically:

Fast, light day hikes with a small pack, where weight on the feet matters more than sole stiffness.
Summer and warm, dry conditions, where breathability keeps feet cool and blister risk down.
Long distance, where the accumulated saving in leg fatigue over the miles is worth a great deal.
Wet ground you are willing to accept, where the drain-and-dry mesh beats a lined shoe that floods and stays wet.
Mixed trail and grippy technical ground in the dry, where the sticky rubber is a real asset.

This is the bulk of my three-season walking on the south coast, which is exactly why a trail runner lives in my kit alongside a proper boot.

When a hiking shoe wins

Reach for a hiking shoe when durability and protection outrank weight. Specifically:

Rocky, sharp or scree ground, where a rock plate and a stiffer sole save your feet from being battered.
Heavier loads, where the extra structure supports the foot under weight far better than a soft, flexible runner.
High-mileage seasons on a budget, where the longer lifespan and harder rubber give you more kilometres per pound.
Cold and sustained wet, where you want to keep water out rather than let it flood through, and where cold wet feet are genuinely unpleasant rather than just tolerable.

If you want the full boot-versus-shoe picture, including where a mid boot with ankle support comes in, that lives in the walking shoes vs walking boots guide and across the hiking boots reviews.

The worked example: Salomon Speedcross 6

The trail runner I actually hike in is the Salomon Speedcross 6, so rather than talk in the abstract, here is how the whole argument above plays out in one real shoe I have put around 200km through on the Jurassic Coast.

At 298g per shoe it lands squarely in the light end of the range, and you feel that on a long coastal day. The mesh and ripstop upper breathes well and drains fast, which is the drain-and-dry approach in practice: through wet grass or after a shower these do not stay soggy. The Mud contaGRIP outsole is the soft, sticky, aggressive-lug type, so grip on wet chalk and limestone is excellent, and true to form the lugs are noticeably less sharp at 200km than they were at 50km. Soft rubber grips, soft rubber wears. That is the deal, and these prove it.

Where they are not the answer is exactly where the theory says a hiking shoe should win: deep mud, boggy winter ground and sustained cold rain. For those days I switch to a proper waterproof boot. But for dry and mild-wet three-season walking on mixed UK trail, the Speedcross 6 is the shoe I reach for first.

If you want the detail, the full Salomon Speedcross 6 review covers the Quicklace system, the GTX versus non-GTX decision and how they held up over the distance.

Buy the Salomon Speedcross 6 on Amazon

If you would rather go the other way and want a structured hiking shoe as your comparison point, that is the kind of thing I will slot in here once I have one properly tested.

Trail and walking shoes at Blacks

Prices pulled live from Blacks, updated daily. Links are affiliate links.

Scarpa Men's Ribelle Cross 2 Mid GORE-TEX Hiking Shoe

£165

Merrell Men's Moab Adventure 3 Waterproof Walking Shoes

£125

Merrell Women's SpeedARC Matis Hiking Shoe

£160

Salomon Men's Barrakee Outdoor Shoes

£59.97

adidas Terrex Men's Multi CLIMAWARM Half Zip Fleece

£65

Merrell Men's Moab Speed 2 Walking Shoes

£99.97

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X Hierro Trek Shoes

£99.97

Altra Men's Olympus 6 Trail Running Shoes

£131.97

UK terrain, honestly

Most UK day walking is not extreme. Coast path, downland, forest track, moorland path, mixed, undulating, often damp underfoot but rarely genuinely technical for long stretches. That kind of ground is close to ideal for a trail runner, which is a big part of why they have caught on here despite the weather.

The exceptions are the ones to plan around. Rocky, bouldery ground in the mountains, long scree, deep winter bog, and sustained cold rain all tilt the argument back towards a hiking shoe or a boot. The sensible answer for a lot of us is not one or the other, it is both: a light trail runner for dry and mild-wet three-season days, and a proper waterproof boot for winter, mud and rough mountain ground.

Browse the current picks in the walking shoes hub and, for the wetter and rougher end, the hiking boots reviews.

FAQ

Are trail running shoes good for hiking?

Yes. For day hikes with a light pack, trail running shoes are a legitimate hiking choice rather than a compromise, and many experienced long-distance walkers now prefer them. They are lighter, breathe and dry faster, and the good ones grip at least as well as a hiking shoe on mixed trail. The main trade-offs are less protection against sharp rock and a shorter lifespan, so they suit day walks and light loads better than heavy multi-day carries over rough mountain ground.

Do trail runners last as long as hiking shoes?

No. A pair of trail running shoes typically gives around 500 to 800km before the cushioning packs out and the grip lugs wear down, whereas hiking shoes with harder-wearing rubber often last 800 to 1,000km or more. The soft, sticky rubber that makes trail runners grip so well is also what makes them wear faster. Per kilometre a hiking shoe is usually cheaper to run, which you weigh against the lighter weight and comfort of the runner.

Can you hike long distance in trail runners?

Yes, and long distance is arguably where they make the most sense. Over big daily mileages the weight saving on your feet reduces leg fatigue significantly, which is why so many long-distance and thru-hikers choose trail runners. Pair them with good socks, accept that you will replace them more often than a hiking shoe, and they are a strong choice for multi-day walking as long as you are not carrying a very heavy pack over sharp, rocky ground.

Are trail runners OK in the wet?

Non-waterproof mesh trail runners handle wet surprisingly well because they drain and dry fast. Water goes straight through the mesh but also straight back out, so on a warm day they are close to dry again within a mile or two. The trick is to accept wet feet rather than fight them, which works well in summer and mild-wet conditions with good socks. In cold, sustained wet they are less pleasant, and that is when a waterproof boot makes more sense.

Trail runners or hiking shoes for the UK?

For most three-season UK day walking on coast path, downland and forest trail, a trail runner is a great fit: light, breathable and grippy, with drain-and-dry mesh that copes with British damp. Switch to a hiking shoe or boot for rocky mountain ground, scree, heavier loads and cold winter bog. Many UK walkers, myself included, keep both and pick by the day rather than treating it as one permanent decision.

Trail running shoes for hiking are not a shortcut or a fudge. For dry and mild-wet day walks with a light pack, they are lighter, cooler and grippier than a hiking shoe, and they dry faster when the ground is wet, at the cost of protection and a shorter life. A hiking shoe still wins on rough rock, heavy loads and sustained cold wet. My own answer is to own both and let the day decide, with a Salomon Speedcross 6 for the light dry days and a proper boot for the rest. Start with the walking shoes hub if you want to see the current picks.

Share X / Twitter Facebook

Found this useful?

Coast & Fell is independent and reader-supported. If something here saved you time or a bad buy, you can buy me a coffee. Thank you, from Maple and me.